tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-712077106443942647.post8185553895006718616..comments2024-02-28T00:15:48.501-08:00Comments on have fun: Programming with C# asynchronous sequencesMarcin Najderhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11205707928830073432noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-712077106443942647.post-54931603564396698422023-03-06T01:04:49.659-08:002023-03-06T01:04:49.659-08:00Windows 11 Activator available on filesmama for fr...<a href="https://filesmama.com/windows-11-activator-pro-activation-product-key/" rel="nofollow">Windows 11 Activator</a> available on filesmama for free download.Files Mama (filesmama.com)https://www.blogger.com/profile/13747110599977863199noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-712077106443942647.post-79771742437721641422011-09-26T15:00:39.601-07:002011-09-26T15:00:39.601-07:00Pretty nice work :-)! I wrote about asynchronous p...Pretty nice work :-)! I wrote about asynchronous programming using C# iterators some time ago (http://tomasp.net/blog/csharp-async.aspx) and so it is quite fun to see that the trick may still be useful, even if C# 5.0 supports asynchronous programming directly. I wonder if the same thing could be also done using `await` (e.g. by writing your own awaitable that handles yielding of elements differently). I'm not sure if it would make much difference - maybe the syntax for waiting for things would be nicer (but yielding would be uglier).<br /><br />I think that combining async with iteration is quite powerful pattern, so it would be nice to see some support for this directly in C#.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com